Sunday, 18 March 2012

‘ Million Oops, A case study on modern project planning and control’. April 2009, RKC Collage and the University of Wales.UK

Project Planning and Control

05 April 2009

Question 01:
On 1st of July 1997 the construction of the Entertainment and Sports Arena started on time in N.C with an estimated finish date of 1st of Sept 1999 which crept later to March 2000, and with a planned budget of $120 million which was later moved up to $158 million.
Along its duration this project suffered cost overrun, schedule overrun, low efficiency of performance and other obstacles. Looking for the reasons under the light of project management we saw obvious shortages at almost the all project management tools such as; leadership, project planning, project control, cost control, risk management, internal and external communication, stakeholder management.
The thesis is going to name those zones where defects were detected as red zones and will stand for their analysis one by one; where and how they were indicated as the thesis is going to prioritise them through arranging them from the highest to the lowest priority.
On the other hand the other hand the positively actions will be highlighted and grouped in a green zone.
Question 02:
The Empire Plastics Northern (EPN) hired two management subcontractors to help achieving its project to increase the production rate of oleic acid. Each of those subcontractors showed different level of performance due to their different management approaches.
Western Construction managed their scope with an eye opened on Team work and communication which helped it to properly achieve.
Teknibuild managed their scope with an eye opened on Man hour this was the main reason beyond their poor performance.
This thesis is trying to address the analysis of each company’s approach.

Answer of Question 01:

Screening of the $26 million oops case study reflected poverty at each of the first four of Mochall’s top five project management major mistakes
1. ‘Inadequate project definition and planning
2. Weak scope change management
3. Not managing the work plan
4. Poor project communication
5. Lack of quality management ‘(Mochal, 2003:1)
Poor project planning, poor change management, poor project control, poor communication besides extra defects in the areas of Leadership, Stockholding management, cost control and Time management. This thesis is going to code those zones as red zones referring to the worst approaches impacted the project they will be prioritised by arranging them accordingly as per their impact on the project success.
On the other hand some good approaches were reached along the project duration, even they were not so efficient they will be analyzed and coded as green zones which will cover the alarms raised on time by some stakeholders and the high quality concrete cat in site.

(1-A) Red Zone Analysis:

1-A-1 Poor Leadership:

In fact it was not easy to determine neither a team work nor a single leader with executive authority at the side of the committee, amongst thirteen members many felt free to make decisions and speak for the committee either to the partners or to media it is here to say that ‘... poor leadership may serve to isolate individuals and deny access to social support and there by exacerbate the negative effects of workplace stressors.’ (Kelloway, et al., 2004:91)
The impact of individuals’ isolation was clearest when lawyer Reef Ivey suggested unstudied project modification from a basket ball arena to a hockey arena. This suggestion transformed the project to a real nightmare. Besides the mistake of odd-made decision he had the default of making a vital decision without visiting an expert.
Another clear impact of the absence of good leadership is the mess the project planning and control as it will be detailed later in this thesis because ‘A good leader creates the agenda. He or she does not let things stagnate ... The leader is proactive and not reactive.’(Leadership-basics, 2009:1)
As seen all the corrective action taken by management were only immediate reactions to the disasters like none of risks were estimated while planning this project.

1-A-2 Poor project planning:

‘According to project management experts, you can spot major trouble on the horizon if you keep your eyes peeled for any of [the] poor project planning symptoms’ (Taylor, 2008)
Starting from the project chart which experienced poverty since the project started; on its top a committee of 13 members none of them has an executive authority to manage the project the committee represented the client and directly managed the job which was being performed by a main contractor the irony was that none of the committee members were specialized in construction projects and they did not even hire an expert at the first 8 working months.
Other poor planning indicator is ignoring rainy winter in North Carolina which repeats once yearly and allowing it to reduce the production average twice. It should be included in the project plan when studying tasks duration against production average winter time tasks could have calculated slotted duration with controlled creep allowance which should not effect the total duration of the project. If considered in a contingency plan, its impact would be controllable.

1-A-3 Poor project control:

The quality of project control heavily depends on the accuracy and completeness of the information given by the control system. (Paliktzoglou, 2009:75) our case study is a clear example of control system absence and how it impacts progress.

1-A-4 Poor change management:

Change management is the process during which the changes of a system are implemented in a controlled manner by following a pre-defined framework/model with, to some extent, reasonable modifications’ (SearchCIO-Midmarket, 2009:1)
Although many marks of management illness can be configured during the project for me the most clear example was when the project transformed to a hockey arena at this point serious and immediate actions should be done ‘every change request should be impacted on the project by determining its effect on the schedule, budget and deliverables’. (Paliktzoglou, 2009:83)
I would use one of my work experience reactions in such a situation when a project is exposed to major change splitting the project into two phases (project phase 01) should include the already performed work as per the old project description and as a closed project and (project phase 02) for the new modification this was a missed opportunity for putting the project back on the track.

1-A-5 Poor cost control:

Good control starts by good planning which must be preceded by good estimation which was totally absent in this project but knowing that contractors and its consultants vastly miscalculated the impact the design changes helps to imagine the project missed cost estimation.
Although setting up a budget checking system is a must for such a changing project ‘Check and recheck budgets. Are you where you should be or are costs running over? Is there a way to reallocate the mix of resources to bring costs back in line?’(Walker, 2004:01) the committee did not consider revision the miscalculated budget change before considering it.
Uncertainty of financial resource which may cover the change as the authority hoped to get the remainder of the money it needs to cover its cost overruns from Raleigh and Wake County this uncertainty reflects the poor cost control once more.

1-A-6 Poor communication:

‘A wolf eats only a stray sheep’ Arabic Proverb ‘Any weakness or problem in any one of three areas - personal, non-personal and organizational communication - can generate a multitude of problems …’ (Williams, 2008:01) this project experienced many organisational communication problems which generated the disability of elaborating the conflict between the contractors and architects in the meeting held in mid January. Instead of trying to work it out the problem was ignored in spite of the committee full awareness of it as chairman Perry Safran said. ‘Communication was a problem.
One more indicator of poor communication when Jordan the team president commented on the probability of the project delay ‘We haven't been told otherwise by anyone’ after Hensel Phelps had said the arena might not be finished until March 2000.

1-A-7 Poor stakeholder management:

‘An up-front analysis of who the stakeholders are and how and when to involve them in the project can prevent potential problems’ (Buthmann, 2008)

Figure 01: Communication Timing Matrix (Buthmann, 2008)
The Hurricanes joined the project as a major partner paying $20 million against their requirements. In principle every thing would be fine with this step if timing and planning were developed to meet the new stage requirements high level of stokehold management was highly recommended yet it was never applied. ‘... for each stakeholder, consider why and what to communicate...Next, develop a communication strategy that focuses on how to directly or indirectly influence and engage the stakeholders...Finally, determine the best time to communicate with the stakeholders and an appropriate spokesperson.’ (Buthmann, 2008) but a clear scope of responsibilities, authorities, and communication amongst stakeholders was never set.

1-A-8 Poor time management:

The lack of time management here is that even good corrective actions were taken late take for example the late hiring of a full time project manager by the committee which took place eight months after starting the construction and the design change negotiations which started t along with the construction process on 1st of July 1997 while a request of the final official list of improvement was raised on Sept. 26, 1997.

(1-B) Green Zone Analysis:

Despite of some alarms were hit on time like that one by Perry Safran ‘Communication was a problem’ and the complain letter sent early on 26 September 1997 by Rouse to Hurricanes financial consultant asking for final official changes besides some positive criticism was performed like when Mayor Tom Fetzer commented on taking a project of this size and scope and putting it in the hands of a bunch of part-time political appointees as it was a disaster which reflected individual standard of professionalism in some areas, no serious response to those alarms were shown.
Another green zone is to be highlighted regarding the quality of work as Williams witnessed that there have been no faulty beams or columns cast in site

Answer of Question 02:

(2-A) Western Construction (managing a Team work)

‘Teaming necessary to accomplish objectives’ (F.Galioto, 2006:05) it is proved that the smoothest the communication flow amongst team members, the closet to their goal they reach. Nowadays as the modern work environment where communication plays a vital role in projects success, thus effective team work management had became a must.
This is what Western construction management attitude confirmed as it had been said by John ‘… communication was just across the corridor…’
Yet the stable information flow is not the only benefit of team work, there is also the individuals sense of responsibility as (Cinda 2007) suggests’ A well-functioning team that exhibits “good teamwork” is made up of individuals each taking personal responsibility for having an impact on the project’ when each of the team players gets truly involved in the game he will be motivated by enthusiasm to win which can simply be interpreted in to project management terms as to accomplish the job perfectly and on time. The moral here that good team managing can serve as a motivator.
Once examining communication, sense of responsibility and motivation together in a team, get ready to trigger success.

(2-B) Teknibuild (managing a Time sheet)

On the other hand John had Teknibuild's site men who had had suffered lack of communication with their head office, further to their site partners. ‘When partnership is the key issue, influencing others by being a good team player is an important strategy for getting work accomplished.’(Subhashini 2009) Unfortunately, Teknibuild did show team work spirit neither externally nor internally
It seemed like their management only cared about man-hours not about accomplishing the job as Holdsworth agreed.
Work environment with lack of team spirit or stable communication is full of frustrated non-motivated resources that their only concern is about fulfilling their timesheets, once they sign attendance sheet they feel they have done their part of the job. References:
1. Tom Mochal (2003) ‘Poor Planning Is Project Management Mistake Number One’. Techrepublic. [accessed 23 March 2009].
2. Kelloway, Ivanathan, Francis & Barling (2004) ‘Sources Of Work Stress’ [accessed 22 March 2009].
3. Leadership-basics (2009) ‘Leadership-Qualities’. Leadership management. basics [accessed on 23 March 2009]
4. Joe Taylor Jr. (2008) ‘Five Signs Your Team Suffers From Poor Project Planning ’.Bright up!. [Accessed 18 March 2009]
5. Paliktzoglou, V. (2009) ‘Project Planning and Control. Unit 04 lecture slides’. Switzerland: Robert Kennedy Collage.
6. SearchCIO-Midmarket (2009) ‘Change Management’ Definitions,,sid183_gci799426,00.html [Accessed 18 March 2009]
7. John P. Walker (2004) ‘Proper Project Planning Prevents Poor Performance’. Cleanlink. May 2004,%20project%20management [accessed on 21 March 2009]
8. Patricia Williams (2008) ‘Poor Communication Can Take Its Toll On Construction Companies, Consultant Warns’ .dailycommercialnews. [accessed on 21 March 2009]
9. Arne Buthmann (2008) ‘Preventing Conflicts Through Stakeholder Management’ [accessed on 21 March 2009]
10. Galioto, F., Kerins J., Lauster, S. & Mitchell, D. (2006). ‘The Matrix Reloaded. The Multi-Axis Organization as Key to Competitive Advantage’. USA: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.
12. Subhashini K. Iyer (2009) ‘Organizational Leadership That Influences Group Behaviour’. [Accessed 31 march 2009]


13. Paliktzoglou, V.)2009) PM 104 Strategic Context of Project Management Lecture Slides’. Switzerland: Robert Kennedy Collage.2009
14. Paliktzoglou, V.)2009) ‘PM 103 Project Planning and Control Lecture Slides’. Switzerland: Robert Kennedy Collage.2009
15. Hugh MacMillan, Mahen Tampoe (2001) ‘Strategic Management: Process, Content, and ImplementationLondon: Oxford Press
16. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc (2007). ‘Chapter Eight The Structure and Culture of a Business Organization’. McGraw-Hill Companies 2007
17. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc (2009). ‘Chapter 11 Organizational Structure’. McGraw-Hill Companies 2009.
18. Organization and Teamwork Prentice Hall 2007 ‘Excellence in Business’. e3.
19. Jay R. GALLBRAITH (February 1971) ‘Matrix Organisation Design how to combine Functional and project forms’. Business Horizons.
20. Maurice Hardaker & Bryan K. Ward, (2003) ‘Getting Things Done, How to Make a Team Work’. Harvard Business Review November-December 1987. USA: EBSCO Publishing
21. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc (2005) ‘Contemporary Management Chapter 10b External and internal organization structures’. McGraw-Hill Companies 2005
22. C.J.Middleton,(2000) ‘ How to Set Up a Project Organisation’ .HBR March-April 1967
23. Duncan, Robert. (1979) ‘What Is the Right Organization Structure? Decision Tree Analysis Provides the Answer’. USA: Organizational Dynamics.
24. Galioto, et al. (2006).’The Matrix Reloaded The Multi-Axis Organization as Key to Competitive Advantage’. USA: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.
25. Tinnirello, Paul C. ‘(2004) ‘New Directions in Project Management’. USA: Auerbach Publications
26. Mechanic, David. "Removing Barriers to Care Among Persons with Psychiatric Symptoms." Health Affairs, 23.6: (2004).Retrieved February 13, 2005:
Mentally Ill Patients
27. "Total Quality management Glossary" Retrieved From Accessed on 21 December, 2004
Total Quality Management
28. Damodar Y. Golhar, Deshpande, Satish P. Ahire & Sanjay L. "Supervisors role in TQM and non-TQM firms"
Total Quality Management
29. Bauerschmidt, Alan, Daniel Sullivan, & Kate Gillespie (1985). "Common Factors Underlying Barriers to Export: Studies in the U.S. Paper Industry," Journal of International Business Studies (Fall), 111-123
Tariffs and Non-Tariff Barriers (NTF)
30. RKC class forum. [accessed on 31 March 2009]
33. [accessed on 31 March 2009]
34. Weihrich, H. and Koontz, H. 1993. ‘Management: A Global Perspective’. 10th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill
36. [accessed on 31 March 2009 ]